[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Final Exam

To: Nanan <nanan9177@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Final Exam
From: "Subbarao Kambhampati" <rao@asu.edu>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:47:20 -0700
Cc: cse471-f06@parichaalak.eas.asu.edu
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=RtDNG+ULdDam1CzgofYo134kkqHfOBnG47HuGnBIMNxXHahAE7JsZV0kIOJ85hdHA7k8/nbLG9TQ8oF6PYuJ/XT3XTr4KbQTCyfN79x89Syr5YkH4UvBfYAVh0OcDG03ZGGJYsom/xN5PCW4BylKv99dazrmz4lCxoQGptyQtzM=
In-reply-to: <e7008c710612101438v1fa06640xeb9ef68ab9a6a11@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e7008c710612101438v1fa06640xeb9ef68ab9a6a11@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: subbarao2z2@gmail.com

You don't need this information. For perceptrons, it is customary to assume that the learning rate alpha
already contains the gradient information (i.e., just use alpha in place of alpha*gradient_of_activation_fn)

Rao

On 12/10/06, Nanan <nanan9177@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Dr. Kambhampati,

Would you please tell me the activation function of the Neuman's Parties question? Thanks :)

Cheers,

Nan

Prev by Date: Re: Clarification needed on DBN question
Next by Date: Final exam marks..
Previous by thread: final exam
Next by thread: Interesting story..
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread