[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: On the Topeka Pagerank questions..
- To: Rao Kambhampati <rao@asu.edu>
- Subject: Fwd: On the Topeka Pagerank questions..
- From: Subbarao Kambhampati <rao@asu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 06:49:44 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=5t46TovpnFpWoKrTksYtUNVHn3gEJt4G8I6lKKsbW3k=; b=aVeyMFDwjUEV36zd3MzVizPe7gw6lnN0VhzXiu3Mme9IfkTPxHjCerCrXlksbiQPI+ 30yO4Y7j9XVvXuklL1sgBE3Ejqm00bVzIuvav0ceBaO3um8s0KxvCr/dlyRl83AqsnlF /D7v0Y6sazWHNX2YVxOFIgVagmzDCLA6PF42I=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=KZYmmEiP7r3GRT7eeWeRZYYLjdy4FGahDLGYgUFQ5foUa7pVuazuEsQwUKkd9rXqR2 UlS4ESLAUy3YfJullA0M0j6XzUeAkPWvoPvQa8y7m8Z0voQzkRD8irek2p2l+2n6KNIo Ti7/wI2ZkOKe0roWzxHpkPpjIZ9tm781MpxuE=
- In-reply-to: <t2u8d80847a1004010647ld0a5c5dsdb1a48e9efb822d6@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <t2u8d80847a1004010647ld0a5c5dsdb1a48e9efb822d6@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: subbarao2z2@gmail.com
Some of you were confused as to how Topeka pagerank compares to the traditional one.
The important thing to note is that Topeka Pagerank first separates web pages into smaller partitions based on their
color and then does equal amount of processing on each of them. It is thus a significantly more efficient computation--since for
each partition, we have a much smaller transition matrix M. The convergence is fast, but the final stationary page rank can be significantly different from the traditional one
(in particular, the separate but equal processing can sometimes prevent pages in some partitions from reaching their full importance--as the other partitions effectively act as rank sinks ).
regards
rao