[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cse 471] Homework-2 Announcements (grade distribution, marking scheme and a missing solution..)
- To: "Aravind Krishna" <Aravind.Kalavagattu@asu.edu>
- Subject: [cse 471] Homework-2 Announcements (grade distribution, marking scheme and a missing solution..)
- From: "Aravind Kalavagattu" <aravind.kalavagattu@asu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:57:17 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; bh=oBLMCd2VCwr4Z+DsYUo1T5Fl0feru5MODyrcApa06dg=; b=N8d5daGpZ1MVsXWjsu1Y+XGjjbLHIKdP9eb8tQ4VzageNf6vIZGzdTovJwCl+Q//l5Qx7i22eezLIuglcqBpEmnBwsX6CrbqD55tqdW38u1OXTNzvjQyHd5IWDt47YJUXyFHVWxPioYPcIihM61jy59LnLoAYG90F89Q5Rrw3Pg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=tK2TrHSJc909xrGHJ/n6NlvZDKyZk16htABRIZIT3QhZneKnda1o4AvDG4f3kKOw97D4jFrwmeqKGEtVo2Qy0zu7RQAmXBr61sl6MET6g6DFEEdHStzV5mpKD6tAfvWKrKGM8Vnk4Lv3eTfHd+3wYkGGaswSBJ4n8nuAPF+gfQg=
- Sender: arvindkrishna@gmail.com
Hi,
Grade Distrubution for Homework-2 :
Grad |
avg:87.4 |
96(H) |
74(L) |
|
|
|
|
UG |
avg:84.8 |
96(H) |
72(L) |
And marking scheme is as follows::
Total : 100 points
PART A:
1. 5
2. 6 (2+2+2)
3.
Part A: 4 (2+2)
Part B: 4
Part C: 8
4.
Part A: 3
Part B: 3
5. 4
PART B: (true or flase )
18 (3 X 6)
[CSP1]
i. 5
ii. 3
iii. 6
[CSP2]
1.1 6
1.2 4
1.3 4
Qn. II (Pattern DB Heuristics)
A.
A.1 2
A.2 2
A.3 3
A.4 5
B.
5
--------------------
And, first part of the CSP solution is missing from the solutions page on the course web-site. I am writing it down below:
[CSP1]
1.
Let Jobs be J1, J2, J3 and J4 and days are d1,d2,d3.
Domains: J1 = {d1,d2,d3}, J2 = {d1,d2,d3}, J3 = {d1,d2,d3}
Constraints as no-goods:
(J1>=J2), (J2>=J3 & J2>=J4), (J3=J2) (J3=J4), (|J4 - J1| < 1)
2. No its not binary. (There is a ternary constraint)
3.
Using forward checking and dynamic variable ordering:
path1 at root: pickup J2=d1, using forward checking J1={ } => this a FAIL case
path2 at root: pickup J2 = d2. [ D(J1) = {d1} D(J3)= {d1,d3} D(J4) = {d1,d2,d3} ]
--> Followed by J1=d1 [ D(J3) = {d1,d3} D(J4) = {d3} ]
--> Followed by J4=d3 [ (D(J3) = {d1} ]
--> Followed by J3=d1 --> all variables are exhausted with no contraints => SUCCESS
So, the assignment is { J1,J3 = d1 ; J2 = d2; J4 = d3 }
----------------
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Aravind