[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cse 471] Proj-1 statistics, grading scheme and comments
- To: "Aravind Krishna" <Aravind.Kalavagattu@asu.edu>
- Subject: [cse 471] Proj-1 statistics, grading scheme and comments
- From: "Aravind Kalavagattu" <aravind.kalavagattu@asu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 11:59:56 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; bh=eIMp80xr0o/Li2jxIo85ff3+4bNQjI/TreWEQdmIGA0=; b=KUOoFbw88uWuvWAFPEUMplbeCcVcAqitxEHu32wxKmDMywJT23H3cA+3fm2tEWc++zprOfJRx9quXZwqfEmHotFPPiG2NHWZRw+SbHZmZSuSU9o53XNe9ZgXw0+krABIL6uMs3SsQXyB1tDdO4OleGl0x3G9bzdxSrKMgZPA3Co=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=srmp+re08lY0rp0wdVa/JcKbYPN4p7WUxZ1EEvEuzZonKxhmYsqaw/bymcLeK4tiFUDOxHocxzBoH2PnuUe/mILi1hfOx4Law2KJxjIkBNIVLEcUghdG0A8i5MC3MS8x2+P9MSffNfKUGQM7Nu3EjT0g35agoKSEW1kj60fV7XA=
- Sender: arvindkrishna@gmail.com
Hi all,
Here are some details on project-1 evaluation:
Grade distribution:
Grad: 93.4 |
(Avg) |
100 (H) |
74 (L) |
|
|
|
|
UG: 90.5 |
(Avg) |
99 (H) |
74 (L) |
ExtraCredit: UG (Highest - 14) Grad (Highest - 40)
Grading Scheme:
Part-1 -- 32 pts ( 2+5+5+5+5+10 - for the tasks)
Part 2 -- 36 pts
A* function - 10 pts
1. Code to collect different statistics - (3+3+3+4+2) - 15 pts
2. Print path - 5 pts
(efficiency + quality of code ) - 6 pts
Part 3 -- Analysis (32 pts)
Correct runs for given 5 test cases with all heuristics and metrics -- 10 pts
Comparison of various heuristics / comments on trends in computed statistics -- 10 pts
Other interesting findings, observations, exceptions and proposed improvements -- 12 pts
Extra Credit: (40 pts)
1. DFS -- 5 pts
2. Weighted F-function -- 8 pts
3. Redundant ancestral removal -- 7 pts
4. Pattern Database heuristic -- 20 pts
Comments::
* Most of you did well (following all the instructions I had sent earlier) and submitted a good report with formatted code, implementation details and analysis of various methods and heuristics.
* 2 students completed all the extra credit problems. In fact, one of them additionally implemented 'pancake sorting' using A* search to test its working on problems with higher branching factor. You're highly encouraged to try such new things, especially to look for
exceptions in the given methods/trends, and suggestions for improving the solutions etc.
* Some of you have to follow better coding practices.
- A couple of students coded three different child generation functions (one for each heuristic) -- which is a very bad coding practice. You should write generalized functions.
- And, hard coding the values should be avoided.
- While printing results to the console, you should format the results properly. (ex: printing the path to goal node, some of you just printed the LISP representation of arrays)
Please let me know if you have any questions on grading.
Thanks,
Aravind