Part 1: Student Evaluation of the Course
 Textbook/supplementary material in support of the course.
 
Very Good
 
11 68.75%
Good
 
3 18.75%
Fair
 
0 0.00%
Poor
 
1 6.25%
Not Applicable
 
1 6.25%
Avg 4.60  
 Value of assigned homework in support of course topics.
 
Very Good
 
13 81.25%
Good
 
3 18.75%
Fair
 
0 0.00%
Poor
 
0 0.00%
Not Applicable
 
0 0.00%
Avg 4.81  
 Value of laboratory assignments/projects in support of the course topics.
 
Very Good
 
12 75.00%
Good
 
2 12.50%
Fair
 
1 6.25%
Poor
 
0 0.00%
Not Applicable
 
1 6.25%
Avg 4.73  
 Reasonableness of exams and quizzes in covering course material.
 
Very Good
 
10 62.50%
Good
 
5 31.25%
Fair
 
1 6.25%
Poor
 
0 0.00%
Not Applicable
 
0 0.00%
Avg 4.56  
 Weight given to labs or projects, relative to exams and quizzes.
 
Very Good
 
9 56.25%
Good
 
5 31.25%
Fair
 
2 12.50%
Poor
 
0 0.00%
Not Applicable
 
0 0.00%
Avg 4.44  
 Weight given to homework assignments, relative to exams and quizzes.
 
Very Good
 
9 56.25%
Good
 
5 31.25%
Fair
 
2 12.50%
Poor
 
0 0.00%
Not Applicable
 
0 0.00%
Avg 4.44  
 Definition and application of criteria for grading.
 
Very Good
 
11 68.75%
Good
 
3 18.75%
Fair
 
0 0.00%
Poor
 
2 12.50%
Not Applicable
 
0 0.00%
Avg 4.44  
Part 1 Overall Avg: 4.57
Part 2: Student Evaluation of Instructor
 The instructor was well prepared.
 
Almost Always
 
14 87.50%
Usually
 
1 6.25%
50% of the time
 
0 0.00%
Occasionally
 
0 0.00%
Almost Never
 
1 6.25%
  Avg 4.69  
 The instructor communicated ideas clearly.
 
Almost Always
 
14 87.50%
Usually
 
1 6.25%
50% of the time
 
1 6.25%
Occasionally
 
0 0.00%
Almost Never
 
0 0.00%
  Avg 4.81  
 The instructor or assistants were available for outside assistance.
 
Almost Always
 
12 75.00%
Usually
 
3 18.75%
50% of the time
 
1 6.25%
Occasionally
 
0 0.00%
Almost Never
 
0 0.00%
  Avg 4.69  
 The instructor exhibited enthusiasm for and interest in the subject.
 
Almost Always
 
16 100.00%
Usually
 
0 0.00%
50% of the time
 
0 0.00%
Occasionally
 
0 0.00%
Almost Never
 
0 0.00%
  Avg 5.00  
 The instructor's approach stimulated student thinking.
 
Almost Always
 
14 87.50%
Usually
 
2 12.50%
50% of the time
 
0 0.00%
Occasionally
 
0 0.00%
Almost Never
 
0 0.00%
  Avg 4.88  
 The instructor related course material to its applications.
 
Almost Always
 
15 93.75%
Usually
 
0 0.00%
50% of the time
 
1 6.25%
Occasionally
 
0 0.00%
Almost Never
 
0 0.00%
  Avg 4.88  
 The instructor's methods of presentation supported student learning.
 
Almost Always
 
14 87.50%
Usually
 
1 6.25%
50% of the time
 
0 0.00%
Occasionally
 
1 6.25%
Almost Never
 
0 0.00%
  Avg 4.75  
 The instructor's grading was fair, impartial, and adequate.
 
Almost Always
 
11 68.75%
Usually
 
2 12.50%
50% of the time
 
3 18.75%
Occasionally
 
0 0.00%
Almost Never
 
0 0.00%
  Avg 4.50  
 The instructor returned graded materials within a reasonable period.
 
Almost Always
 
12 75.00%
Usually
 
1 6.25%
50% of the time
 
3 18.75%
Occasionally
 
0 0.00%
Almost Never
 
0 0.00%
  Avg 4.56  
Part 2 Overall Avg: 4.75
Overall Evaluation of the Course and Instructor
 Overall quality of the course and instruction.
 
Excellent
 
12 75.00%
Very Good
 
3 18.75%
Good
 
0 0.00%
Fair
 
1 6.25%
Poor
 
0 0.00%
  Avg 4.63  
 How do you rate yourself as a student in this course?
 
Excellent
 
8 50.00%
Very Good
 
6 37.50%
Good
 
2 12.50%
Fair
 
0 0.00%
Poor
 
0 0.00%
  Avg 4.38  
General Information
 Is this a required course in your program of study?
 
Yes
 
8 50.00%
No
 
8 50.00%
 What are the average hours/week spent studying for this course?
 
1
 
0 0.00%
2
 
0 0.00%
4
 
5 31.25%
8
 
6 37.50%
16
 
5 31.25%
 What is your class standing?
 
Graduate Student
 
16 100.00%
Senior
 
0 0.00%
Junior
 
0 0.00%
Sophomore
 
0 0.00%
Freshman
 
0 0.00%
 What % of the class meetings have you attended?
 
10 to 29
 
0 0.00%
30 to 49
 
1 6.25%
50 to 69
 
0 0.00%
70 to 89
 
0 0.00%
90 to 100
 
15 93.75%
 What did you like most about this course?
The way the ideas were introduced and how emphasis was given to develop the "right" inuition.
Professor is amazing!
It did a good job of covering important areas in IR, Data Mining, and information extraction. Many interesting and novel ideas were presented. The professor is obviously very intelligent and interested/expert in many diverse areas. That breadth of knowledge was fun to see.
everything..
The content, way of presentation, project, open environment.
The teacher was very excited, and I learned many new things. Also, putting videos on the website was excellent.
inspires thinking, and broadens vision.
 What did you like least about this course?
In the short-term the all-nighters pulled to finish the projects and homeworks were annoying. But it proved to be useful, as I ended up learning a lot.
Nothing.
Jumbled slides were the only reference, and they were disorganized with limited, poor examples to work from. There was some overlap with this and other courses I've taken, thank goodness, so I could use simple slides from the others to make sense of simple problems that were unintelligible in this courses slides (despite feedback from many students asking for clearer examples they didn't improve). Questions and participation were discouraged (in abrupt ways), and class was an average of ten minutes over time every day (even though students expressed concerns that they had to get to other classes afterwards). There's even going to be an extra class during the busiest time of the semester because the professor's trying to cram way too much in. I'd prefer the professor spent this extra time cleaning up the slides, I think I'd learn more. Instead I spend more time in and out of class trying to decipher the course content.
nothing..
nothing mostly.
The homeworks and projects could have been better described. I had many questions about what was asked of us.
grading is picky
 Comments
The instructor is top-class. The course has increased my breadth-wise knowledge of computer science. It has done a lot of good to my self-confidence. Thanks Rao for offering this awesome course. Keep up the good work.
The information in this class is invaluable and I'm glad to know it. Making data mining a pre-req for this course would save time and allow the professor to get to everything without having to extend all of his classes.
nice course.. exceptional instructor whose teaching skills make difficult topics easy to understand..
suggestion - asu or atleast cs dept should record such courses (courses taken by prof rao) and make them freely available.. similar to mit ocw..
Best professor.
The instructor has a lot of attitude.A teacher should always be humble.
excellent course overall